|
Response to Town Talk - Dec. 11th
Dear Editor:
Hi Gail. I enjoy your town
talk articles and the passion and spirit that accompany them. There are
times that you ask a number of questions on given topics or incidents. I
am not sure if people write to you in response to provide you some
answers to those questions.
As a young man born and raised in the
Pass and one who has also delivered the Pass Herald as a youth, I
thought perhaps I should make an effort to help add some clarity to your
questions and make a contribution to the Herald based on my 20 years of
experience in Law Enforcement.
The Pass Herald is an institution in the
Crows Nest Pass and I thank you and your staff for allowing us to access
some of the contents of the paper through the internet. It provides
former residents an opportunity to keep current with events and issues
that develop within your community.
Although I live on Vancouver Island,
many of the challenges and concerns facing the pass residents are not
unique to your community particularly when it comes to the Criminal
Justice System and issues relating to Law Enforcement.
In your article, you were wondering why
it took three hours for police to issue an amber alert in the
investigation involving the kidnapping of a 6 year old by an 18 year
old. I don’t know the facts of the case and can only speculate like
others, however I have certainly been involved in a significant number
of cases where children have been reported missing by parents or
relatives with a happy ending. In these instances, if there is any
evidence that leads to the facts that the child was abducted then the
amber alert would be activated immediately. The Amber Alert system is a
North American alert system and readers can find all the information
they need on the topic on the internet.
They can also go to their local police
department and ask about the program there. In short, an amber alert
notifies the public throughout North America through media outlets that
a child has been abducted. If however, the only information available is
that the child did not come home as scheduled, or didn’t show up at a
given location as expected, that is not enough information to activate
an amber alert. It would take away the effectiveness of an amber alert
if it was activated without due diligence. There are identical protocols
for activating the Amber Alert in both Canada and the United states. I
have attached them from the internet.
To avoid both false alarms and having alerts
ignored as a "wolf cry", the criteria for issuing an alert are rather
strict. Each state's or province's AMBER alert plan sets its own
criteria for activation, meaning that there are differences between
alerting agencies as to which incidents are considered to justify the
use of the system.
However, the U.S. Department of Justice issues
the following "guidance", which most states are said to "adhere closely
to"[5]:
1. law enforcement must confirm that an
abduction has taken place
2. the child must be at risk of serious injury
or death
3. there must be sufficient descriptive
information of child, captor, or captor's vehicle to issue an alert
4. the child must be 17 years old or younger
As investigators, we are required
to examine every possible scenario to make certain it is an abduction
rather than that the child has simply decided to be elsewhere due to a
breakdown in communication between the child and the parents or
relatives. I continue to respond to a number of these calls and to date
have always located the child somewhere other than where they are
supposed to be. We live in a world now where in many cases; both parents
work outside the home (dayshift and nightshift) and rely on other
support services to help take care of their children.
Inevitably, there is a breakdown in
communication. Adding to the mix, are those youths who in anger refuse
to come home after a morning dispute with their parents but decide not
to tell their parents as a form of punishment. There are also those
parents who are involved in custody disputes where one interprets the
court order differently than the other. As such, it is not uncommon for
a parent to call me and emand an amber alert because their ex- husband
or wife refuses to return the children pursuant to a court order. I am
confident that without these strict protocols we would be in constant
amber alert mode given today’s dynamic world. Having said that, there
are incidents when children are abducted and although the ratio is very
low, the fact that it does happen, keeps us all on “alert” and thinking
the worst when a child is not accounted for. We simply have to look at
our local schools to show how we as a society have evolved when it comes
to protecting our children. When I grew up in the Pass, most of us
walked to school and only when the bitter cold hit, were we driven.
Today, traffic congestion is such a problem at our schools everywhere
that we have officers assigned to assist in the safe flow of traffic in
the morning and afternoons.
When new schools are being built,
traffic flow receives significant consideration. I hope this helps clear
up your enquiry about the amber alert and perhaps it may stimulate your
readers to also learn about the program. I wish you and your staff a
very Merry Christmas and a safe and prosperous new year.
Rick Maillot
Sidney B.C.

 |