|
Range wars
Dear Editor:
David McIntyre
is an interesting guy; he is well respected. He is good with words.
Strapping guns onto a sheriff’s posse to
go off chasing after renegades saddled with a pack of "asked-for
problems" seems to David like last century's solution for solving
today's range wars. Rein in the Sheriffs he says, hold onto your horses
and slow up, "(s)ociety doesn't need a new park".... all we need are "parklike
management tools."
Meanwhile, back home (on the range)
grazing permit holders don't want as many, let alone more, people in the
area compromising their grazing capacity. They want longer terms for
their current permits (for increased financial value if they were to
sell their lease) and they want greater security that no one is going to
take away their leases if the area is designated a park. Some permits
holders would like a Heritage Rangeland Park which would give gazing use
greater priority and protection.
Not meaning to cause problems for
ranchers and their tender-loined baby calves, conservation groups
want grizzly bear habitat expanded and a grizzly bear recovery plan
initiated. They think Wildland Parks are needed to give grizzlies a
little space to roam (on the range).
Allan Wakaluk wants a little space (on
the range), too. He has applied through Forestry's Alberta Tourism and
Recreation Lease (ATRL) program to build a four-season OHV staging area
at the abandoned Provincial Ranger Station at the confluence of the
South and West Castle Rivers. But the ranchers want that space and don't
want the people, so too the grizzlies, and remember that David doesn't
want sheriffs gallivanting around those parts, hoofs apounding the
montane. Once again, back home (on the range) while the Quad Squad is
chasing up money, manpower, and heavy equipment to place high quality
engineered bridges over streams, somebody chased after one of their
bridges and cut it into two pieces. Made the environmental groups sweat
through their britches over allegations of "ecoterrorism."
Everybody is getting edgy and insecure
about this land and their interest and use in it. Then Dr. Horejsi fires
off a salvo, double barrels ablazing - we're living it folks, this
really is the wild west. His letter to the editor called environmental
groups' actions fraudulent, senseless, irresponsible. He also took pot
shots at motorized vandalism, thrillcraft (OHVs), and the traditional
land abusers. Dr. Horejsi would ride everybody out of town on a rail and
he doesn't want a park either, he wants a hearing. So, as hard as is it
to image, I believe David McIntrye has got this one wrong. We elected
representatives to the legislature to protect our common interests. When
things get ragged and wooly out on the range, its time for law and
order. The tools are no longer a lone tree and a noose, nor blazing six
guns; the law of the day is legislation and the best legislation for our
current range war is parks legislation, not "park-like management
tools." The Andy Russell - I’tai sah kòp Wildland & Provincial Park
proposal for Southwest Alberta is a good idea because it is the best
idea.
It is in our common interest.
Tim Grier

 |